case-study 04 Nov

Cutting Cement Mill Energy Costs with Agentic AI

Industry
Cement
Published in
International Cement Review, November 2026, Energy Efficiency section
Authors
Vasu Sharma, Lasse Alsmeyer, Max Kissel
About
A technical article by Juna AI on the two levers behind a cement mill's electricity cost per tonne: when the mills run, and how much energy each tonne needs. It shows how agentic production planning shifts mill operation into lower-price hours within real plant constraints, and how agent-built analysis tools help engineers reduce energy per tonne.

Executive Summary

Electricity is one of the largest controllable costs in cement grinding, and it has two levers: when the mills run, and how much energy each tonne needs. This article shows how Juna Factory OS works both on one shared plant model.

Running mills in low-price hours sounds simple. In practice, silo capacity, delivery commitments, minimum run lengths, changeovers, shared conveyors and electrical limits decide which hours can move at all. The agentic planner schedules production against electricity prices inside these limits, projects silo levels forward, and keeps committed runs in place when the plan updates. A hedge does not remove the opportunity: where surplus power can be resold, every contracted MWh burned in an expensive hour gives up its resale value.

On the second lever, AI agents build analysis tools directly on the plant model, such as specific energy consumption per production run, mill and product. Engineers see where energy per tonne is drifting and why, and confirmed improvements feed straight back into the schedule.

The worked example in the article: a plant consuming 100 GWh a year, with 70 GWh hedged at €80/MWh. Moving 15 GWh from €140/MWh hours into €80/MWh hours saves €900,000 a year, a 10.5% reduction of the hedged commodity bill, with production, closing stocks and the hedge unchanged. Each feasible GWh shifted is worth €60,000, before further operating cost savings.

Worked example, 100 GWh plant

What Changed

Juna built a hybrid digital twin of the spray dryer, integrating:

  • Heat and mass transfer physics
  • Historical production data
  • Real-time sensor signals
  • Operator knowledge and constraints

On top of this twin, reinforcement learning agents were trained in simulation to learn optimal control strategies before deployment. Once live, the AI Co-Pilot:

  • Predicts process behavior ahead of time
  • Recommends optimal setpoints (Exhaust Air Temp, Main Air Temp, Fluid Bed Temp)
  • Balances moisture precision, throughput, and energy simultaneously
  • Continuously adapts to product variation, ambient conditions, and equipment drift

The result is a control system that learns from every batch, reduces operator variability, and runs the spray dryer closer to its true physical optimum — safely, transparently, and autonomously.

Download the full case study

Other case studies